The early-2016 MacBook also offers 8GB of RAM in the base model as well. The new, early-2016 MacBook does have improvements under the hood, including a new Intel Core M5 Skylake processor, which is still clocked at 1.20GHz, for the base model. ~15% faster than the equivalent 2015 model: MacBook (Early 2016) Geekbench 3 result: 2 days ago &0183 &32 Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Retina Early 2015) with an Intel Core i7-5557U processor. The Multi-Core Score in the early-2016 MacBook showed up as 5252, while the Multi-Core Score for the 2015 model is 4621. Compare that to the 2015 model (MacBook 8,1), and the score is 2303 in the GeekBench 3 scores. Geekbench 6.1.0 for macOS AVX2 Result Information. Top Single-Core Results Top Multi-Core Results Recent Results. Specifically, when a model is compared to the 2015 model, the 2016 version outperforms the older portable by upwards of 15%. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Retina Early 2015) with an Intel Core i5-5287U processor. Great range of Raspberry Pi Buy barebones & Intel NUC desktops online. Instead we should look to the performance gains over time of less obvious features like compute power to make our decisions.The early-2016 MacBook has only just been announced by Apple today, and already early GeekBench scores are trickling in.Īs revealed by John Poole via Twitter, the early-2016 MacBook does appear to outperform last year’s model by a well enough margin. The NUC 9 Pro will be available with following two CPU flavors: Intel Xeon E-2286M (2. Especially with Apple devices where such big feature advances (like the Touch Bar) are few and far between. Upload Date: J01:02 PM: Views: 4: System Information. These scores are the average of 3,378 user results uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. Top Single-Core Results Top Multi-Core Results Recent Results. The MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2023) with an Apple M2 Max processor scores 2,732 for single-core performance and 14,431 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. These benchmarks highlight that as consumers (and developers) we shouldn’t only rely on big feature advances when considering an upgrade. What s new for the mid-2015 model Apple switched to the Force Touch trackpad first introduced a few months back in the latest generation 13 Retina MacBook. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (15-inch Retina Mid 2015) with an Intel Core i7-4980HQ processor. This makes me wonder how much more powerful the newest MacBook Pros are.? The MacBook Pro (13-inch Early 2011) with an Intel Core i5-2415M processor scores 456 for single-core performance and 873 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. The newer 2015 MacBook Pro is dramatically more powerful. The MacBook Pro (13-inch Early 2011) is a Mac laptop with an Intel Core i5-2415M processor. 2 hours ago &0183 &32 Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (15-inch Early 2011) with an Intel Core i7-2720QM processor. Here’s how the two computers compare: Score Typeīoth CPU scores are pretty similar but the massive difference is in the OpenCL compute power which includes the CPU, graphical processing, hardware accelerators, etc. To determine which was more performant I decided to use Geekbench to take benchmarks and compare. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Retina Early 2015) with an Intel Core i5-5257U processor. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Retina Early 2015) with an Intel Core i7-5557U processor. From the specs I assumed my personal computer would have the better performance (but that would be odd given it’s age), although my work computer does seem to handle Docker better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |